Tuesday, October 13, 2009

Celebrating Nothing

For a long time I have thought that participation trophies for kids who play sports, or anything else that involves winning and losing, are sending the wrong message. Kids are being rewarded for just being there, instead of learning that being part of a team has its rewards that go way beyond a hunk of plastic mounted on another hunk of plastic. As a result they do not experience the satisfaction of working hard to achieve a goal, unless you call having your mom drop you off once or twice a week so that you can stand around all season in order to be rewarded the obligatory hunks of plastic.

This seems to go all the way up to major league baseball. I rarely, if ever, pay attention to baseball anymore for reasons too numerous to discuss here. But once in awhile I will see clips on the news and the other night I saw a clubhouse celebration, complete with champagne (the adult version of hunks of plastic) after the Dodgers beat the Cardinals in their best-of-five division playoff series. Here are grown me celebrating like they had won it all. Sure they should have been happy that they won, but all this means is that they get to move on to the next round, which still isn't the "World" Series ("World" is a misnomer because this championship only includes teams from across the US and a tiny bit of Canada, hence the added quotation marks.) Did they really need to break out the bubbly for this? I don't think so, because I believe that this is just another example of a participation trophy. Sure they won something but, did they really? At the end of the seemingly endless playoffs, that will end just in time for us to watch Thanksgiving Day throwball (football) games, no one will remember or care who did what during this first round of playoffs. C'mon Dodgers. Act like grownups, smile, pat each other on the back for making it to the next round and save the champagne celebration for winning the big one.

Monday, January 12, 2009

In the paper - 01.11.09

In the Sunday Outlook section of the Houston Chronicle was an op-ed from Michael Tanner, a senior fellow at the Cato Institute. His subject was health care reform, where he tried to make a case against federal controls. He made six distinct points, each of which tries to frighten the reader into concluding that the government cannot do anything to improve the current health care mess. Here they are with my take on each:

You could lose your current insurance - This is a fact of life every time one changes or loses their job. Health insurance is not portable for those lucky enough to have a job and insurance. Plus would losing your current insurance be such a bad thing if the insurance you currently have is crap? And what about the millions of folks without insurance? What would they be losing?

You could lose the power for you and your doctor to decide what retention will receive - Guess what? You and your doctor do not have the power to make treatment decisions now. These are made by the suits in the insurance companies. Perhaps taking these guys out of the equation would give you and your doctor more power.

You could lose the ability to spend your own money for the health care you want - This is just a plain crap. Nothing that the government does can prohibit one from traveling to another country to acquire better health care. You may have trouble getting into the country based on their entry requirements, but unless Bush has taken away more rights from us than I am aware of we are free to travel to obtain health care at our own risk and on our own dime, for those fortunate enough to have their own dime.

You could lose your current doctor - Guess what? Anytime that you change insurance, and this has become more frequent as employers shop companies to get the best rate, you can be told that your doctor does not accept the new insurance. Of course, there are provisions for you to pay through the nose for your now “out of network” doctor, which is more crap to generate more revenue for the insurance companies.

You could lose access to the latest drugs and medical advancements - Do you really think that you have this access now?. These decisions are currently being made by the insurance suits, who current limit your access to the latest drugs and medical advancements, unless you want to pay for these “out of plan” costs.

And, of course, higher taxes - This is the only point that he presents as a definite, i.e., it is not prefaced by the words “you could”. When all else fails tell them that they will pay higher taxes. How did that work out for McCain? The only reason that we would pay higher taxes for health care reform would be if the executive and legislative branches did not try to find a way to fund this with cuts elsewhere. This may be a pipe ream but even so, why should we be concerned that we will pay higher taxes for something that is truly needed? Plus isn’t it interesting that we can find a trillion dollars to invade and occupy Iraq but we do not have the money to ensure that the least among us have health care? Where are our priorities Mr. Tanner?

Sunday, January 04, 2009

In the paper - 12.25.08

The one or two of you who read this blog probably already know this but just in case you do not - I can be placed in the “old school” bucket for nearly everything. This includes preferring to read the paper every morning rather than doing the online thing to find out what is going on in the world. This certainly has its disadvantages, the most noteworthy of which is that I receive a single view of the world because I only subscribe to a single newspaper, the Houston Chronicle. However, the Chronicle is a fairly decent paper that offers a good mix of conservative and progressive viewpoints. If the Chronicle were anything like the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review or Washington Times I would probably not subscribe and join the masses online.

Everyday the Chronicle has one or more stories that either puzzle or infuriate me. I intend to start relaying some of them here when I have the time. To begin let’s look at two “nuggets” that were in the Christmas Day edition.

On the front page was a nice article about a pastor who gave $100 to anyone who would use the money to help the less fortunate among us. The article went into the whole sermon part of his message more than I will relay here but let’s just leave it as a church leader trying to encourage members of his congregation to get out there and do some good. (Just a small aside – I was not particularly pleased to see this article on the front page of a Thursday edition of the paper. The Chronicle has a special Religion section that they include every Saturday, where this article should have been placed. But being Christmas I give them a pass on this.) 55 members of his congregation accepted the offer and the article went on to describe some examples of the great things that these folks did. One woman turned the $100 into $36,000 by obtaining donations to help provide clothing for folks in Galveston who lost everything during Hurricane Ike. Others did equally impressive things to make their $100 do a lot more than some of us could imagine.

So, these folks, and all churches who do great things to help the least among us should be commended for their good work. But as I read this article I couldn’t help wondering about the magnitude of assistance that could have been provided to needy folks if churches would have spent the tens of millions that they raised to fight gay marriage on more meaningful projects. Plus the result if the investment would have immediate returns, rather than the intangible and discriminatory "benefits" from preventing two people from making a legal commitment to each other.

The other article was buried on an inside page. This one covered the pardons that Bush has begun to issue. This is a practice that has been going on for a long time and has never passed the smell test for me. But the activities surrounding a specific pardon particularly caught my eye.

On December 23 Bush pardoned a guy who was convicted of illegal storage and disposal of hazardous waste without a permit. But after being provided additional information Bush rescinded the pardon the following day. The article did not editorialize but I am sure that there are people all over the country lauding Bush for reversing his decision once he had more information. My thoughts did not go there, but rather the opposite direction as in “Then why in the hell did he not pull our troops out of Iraq when he learned there were no weapons of mass destruction?” So my takeaway from that article is that Bush has the capacity to do the right thing, (the rescinded pardon) but not always the will (Iraq).

Wednesday, October 29, 2008

Who will vote for McCain-Palin?

Have you noticed that the current message from Republican candidates for president and vice president is filled with total crap? Specifically:

Obama wants to impose socialistic values on the US - Well, I hate to break it to you two, but the US is already supported by socialistic values as in, the minimum wage, fair labor practices, Social Security, Medicare, Chrysler bailout, AIG bailout, agriculture subsidies, oil subsidies, etc.

Obama wants to redistribute wealth - Again, this is already in place in the form of taxes. Every time that Congress spends a single dollar they are redistributing our wealth. The most recent example is the $700 bailout of the financial industry.

Obama wants to give a tax break to people who do not pay taxes - Please show me who these people are. Everyone, I repeat, and a bit louder this time, EVERYONE pays taxes, with the only exception being someone who never participates in any form of commerce where money is exchanged for goods and services, i.e. people who live in the wilderness who would not be able to cash a tax refund check anyway.

I guess there must be a large group of people out there who just cannot think for themselves and will believe this stuff. Otherwise why would McCain, Palin, and their surrogates continue to spew this nonsense?

How can anyone vote for these two? I believe that a person who votes for McCain-Palin is either greedy, ignorant, or just not paying attention.

The Greed Group- I can understand that someone making more that $250,000 per year would not want to pay more taxes, and repealing the Bush tax cuts for the rich would certainly make the folks in this group pay more. This group has more basis for their vote than the other two groups and their vote is understandable. But nearly all of these folks are fairly intelligent and should be able to see that continuing the current administration policies is not good for anyone and in the long term will hurt even these greedy bastards.

The Ignorant Group - Where do I start? I have always thought that single-issue voters are stupid. So this includes those whose vote is based on god, gays, guns, etc. Also in this group are all flavors of racists, from those who will not vote for a black person and are not afraid to say so to those who mask it by using such marvelous excuses as not wearing a flag pin, a middle name, inaccurate religious labeling, casual or tangential associations, etc. Then there are those who will just believe anything that McCain or Palin say, like the stuff that I led off this blog post with. Nuff said about that. An finally, the group that pulls the lever, clicks the box, punches the card, etc. in the place for a straight party vote. This is only available in 17 states but it is still a sign of ignorance when a voter chooses this option rather than making a real decision to vote for an actual person.

The Oblivious Group - This is the worst group of all. These people just are not paying attention to what is going on around them. If they were they would see right through McCain’s tactics. They would understand that he is not a person of high character and solid judgment (adulterer, Keating 5, Iraq vote). The whole prisoner of war thing does not make him anymore qualified to lead out military than someone without that experience. As for experience, which he touts as his advantage over Obama, experience in what? With all of that experience in the Senate why did he not ask the questions necessary to make the right vote on Iraq? And the topper is his choice of a running mate. Palin? Palin? Really? Why?

There may be a few folks out there who vote for McCain-Palin that may have legitimate, well-founded reasoning to back up their vote, but I doubt it. Although they would never admit it, nor could I prove it, but I believe that under it all these folks would fall into one of the three groups above.

So, next week, there will be a whole lot of people who vote for McCain-Palin. Even if Obama wins, can we really be that satisfied or energized when we know that there is an enormous number of people in this country who are greedy, ignorant, or oblivious, and are satisfied with themselves? It is not likely that he, or anyone, will be able to get through to these folks.

The positive to come out of all of this? At least the election will be over.

Friday, October 24, 2008

The Conversation III

Riiiiinng.
Riiiiinng.
Riiiiinng.
Riiiiinng.

W: Hello?

McC: Good morning Mr. President, did I catch you at a bad time?

W: No, not at all. I am just working on my legacy.

McC: How is that going?

W: It is kind of iffy right now, but I am just getting started.

McC: What does it look like so far?

W: Well, here is what I got. I began with a plain sheet of paper, drew a line down the middle to start listing Pros and Cons. So far I have more Cons than Pros.

McC: What is on your lists?

W: On the Pro side I have only one thing, “Got reelected”. On the Con side I have “Iraq, ignored pre-9/11 intelligence report, lied about nation building, Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo, torture, etc., Halliburton and Blackwater, axis of evil, wouldn’t support Kyoto Treaty, tax cuts to the rich, no energy policy, “Brownie” and Katrina, squandered the surplus, ran up the national debt and the federal deficit, ignored a culture of corruption among GOP (Delay, Abramnoff, etc.), lost respect and support for US from global community, No Child Left Behind, the prescription drug bill, illegal wiretapping, outing Valerie Plame, refusing to fund stem cell research, Rumsfeld, Gonzalez, Ridge, Scooter, and numerous other incompetent crony appointees. And that is just on the first page.

McC: Wow, you have a lot of work to do to get some of those into the other column.

W: I have some time left, plus what else do I have to do except watch you and Obama go at it?

McC: That is why I am calling, I need some help with that.

W: Sure John, just tell me where you want me to be and I will get out there and work my magic. Plus I would like to spend some time with that cutie running mate of yours. She really speaks to me.

McC: No, no, that isn’t what I need right now.

W: Then, what can it be? I already got Karl out there with you. He is such a master at the making the frivolous, nonsense seem so important. He even makes some stuff up. Remember South Carolina in 2000?

McC: [sighs] Yes I remember, and because of that I think that you owe me a couple of favors.

W: Sure John. What can I do?

McC: First could you please contact bin Laden and ask him to put out another one of his tapes, this time telling everyone that if Obama is elected that he will attack the US with even greater force than he did in 2001?

W: [laughing uncontrollably]

W: [still laughing]

McC: What was that noise?

W: [still laughing]

W: [finally gaining control] That was me falling out of my chair. I couldn’t help it, I was laughing so hard.

McC: Why?

W: Because you think that I can call bin Laden to make a tape.

McC: Why is that funny? Everyone knows that you were behind the tape that was released right before the election in 2004.

W: Yes, I was. But I don’t have call bin Laden to get a tape. We have a couple of guys that we brought up from Gitmo in the basement of the Pentagon who make all of those tapes.

McC: Really?

W: Oh, c’mon John. Didn’t you know that?

McC: I guess not. So can you get those guys to make a tape?

W: Sure, when do you want it?

McC: NOW! I am dying out here.

W: OK, I will get my guys working on that. You said that you needed two things. What is the other one?

McC: Right. I need you to call that voting machine guy.

W: Consider it done. See you in January.

McC: Thank you Mr. President.

Wednesday, October 01, 2008

Palin's 3 AM phone call

Riiiiinng.

Riiiiinng.

Riiiiinng.

Riiiiinng.

[answers, yelling]

"Can't you see that I am breastfeeding here?

[pause, listening]

"No, not Trig, but Bristol 's out-of-wedlock brat, Trojan."

[pause, listening]

"Because she had to go on an overnight field trip with her gun safety class. She could have said 'no' to that, but that word doesn't seem to be in her 17-year old vocabulary. Abstinence, schmabstinence. What are schools teaching these kids nowadays, anyway?"

[pause, listening]

“Oh. That’s right. I just followed the party line to keep winning elections. Maybe we should have been teaching sex education in our schools. Heaven knows I could have used it.

[pause, listening]

“Trojan? Yes, it is an unusual name, like all of my children. Palins have always given their kids names that have personal meaning, like my Track, who is in Iraq, who was born during track season.”

[pause, listening]

“Trojan? Because it will be a daily reminder to her that she not to do it again without one.”

[pause, listening]

“Levi? that slacker. I don’t know where he is. He promised to marry her and disappeared into the North Country. What kind of name is Levi? Did they leave their jeans on?”

[pause, listening, still laughing]

“No, leave him alone. He probably wouldn’t be a good influence on Trojan anyway. Say, what did you want?

[pause, listening]

“Where?

[pause, listening, looking confused]

“Never heard of it. Have I ever been there?”

[pause, listening, getting hot]

“Listen smartass. I have too much to do with four kids running around here to be gallivanting around the world talking to people that I can't understand."

[pause, listening]

“I know it’s my job but I am a mother first. This other stuff will have to wait a few years, until I get a few more of them into the Army.”

[pause, listening]

“Hell no, they aren’t smart enough to go to college. I just barely got through myself after finding the “right” school, if you know what I mean, and have you ever seen their father? Listen we need to wrap this up. I need to shift Trojan to the other nipple. So what did Crapistan do?”

[pause, listening, then hot again]

“Don’t correct me. I’m the president. You guys didn’t correct W all of the time did you?”

[pause, listening, then in a sing-song mocking tone, repeating the answer]

“’At least he knew the name of foreign countries’. Well big deal. Could he see one of these ‘foreign countries’ from Texas?”

[pause, listening]

“Mexico doesn’t count. They have never been a threat to us.”

[pause, listening]

“They were? A war? When?

[pause, listening]

“Hmmm. I didn’t know that. Let’s get back to now.

[pause, listening]

"Aw, fuck ‘em, nuke the bastards, I'm going to be saved because of that rapture stuff that I signed up for at church. See you in the morning, and don't call here again unless it's REALLY important!"

[slams phone down on the night stand, Trojan starts crying.]

"Shhhhh, don't cry. Grandma has to run the country once in a while."

Thursday, August 21, 2008

I Want a Voice Part 7 – The Texas Primary Lessons Learned

Looking back on the whole thing I have to say that I am glad to have taken part in the process. I am still not sure what part, if any that I played in the whole Texas Two Step, as our primary process has been dubbed. What I know is this:

· The method by which Texas selects the delegates it sends to the national conventions is extremely flawed and not at all democratic. The one person one vote idea does not exist and while folks will parrot the party line that everyone has equal access to the primary and caucus, they certainly do not.

· I have no idea how any of the calculations are made to determine the number of delegates that each candidate is awarded as a result of the voting and caucusing. I am sure that somebody somewhere knows but even after being through the process all the way up to the state convention it is not clear how the numbers that are eventually derived for delegate assignment to the national convention are determined. Although I have no proof and everything may be easily explained by someone “in the know”, I suspect that this process is intentionally vague to permit the party leadership to do just about anything that they wish, regardless of the outcome of the primary/caucus voting.

· Delegates to the state convention are assured repeatedly that they have an important role to play and must make every effort to attend the convention. Aside from showing up and being counted as having been there I had no discernable impact on anything. Plus I do not think that my showing up was really that significant.

· My guess is that the Democratic leaders wanted everyone there for fundraising. Attendance at all of the “can’t miss” receptions, dinners, and events always required a fairly expensive donation disguised as a cover charge or fee.

· All of the events, from the caucus through the state convention were very poorly managed. Very little advanced thought or preparation appeared to go into any of these disasters. The worst was the state convention. There is absolutely no excuse for any of this. Except for the caucus they knew in advance the number of attendees and still did not spend the time or effort to prepare. They also do not get a totally free pass on the caucus because the large turnout during the early voting should have been a clue that there would be larger than normal numbers at the caucuses. The Democrats need to spend some of those donations on a professional conference organizer who can manage large groups of people.

· After the state convention I received a number of email messages asking me to for donations that would be used to send the alternate delegate from our district to the national convention. We were told at the meetings before the national convention that the estimated cost to attend the national convention was between $3,500 and $6,000. I am not sure why this is so steep but numerous officials assured us that this was an accurate estimate. I found these multiple requests for donations extremely annoying. Anyone who could not afford to either foot this bill or take out a loan to do so should not have run for this position. Needless to say I did not send her a donation.

· This experience reinforced my lifelong commitment to maintaining independence from any political party. The Democratic Party is an extremely disorganized and dysfunctional group of people. After taking a peek on the inside of their act I want nothing to do with anything remotely associated with them. I tire quickly and easily of their “we-they” rhetoric that is spewed constantly. They seem no better than the Republicans in this regard. Their processes seem only to be designed to get Democrats elected and not to make anything better for the people of this country. I guess we will have to live with this until the country wises up and eliminates the stranglehold that the two parties have on politics in this country. Based on how they have stacked the deck against third parties I do not see this changing in my lifetime. Hopefully future generations will wise up and change this system.

So, OK, I am still an Obama supporter. But my enthusiasm is dwindling as we get closer and closer to Election Day. His changing position on various issues is making him appear to be just like another politician. I am losing confidence that anything will change if he is elected. We all know that McCain will be four more years of what we have now so I cannot vote for him. So I guess it is Obama, for now.

I Want a Voice Part 6 – The Texas State Democratic Convention

The big day arrived and I opted to get up early a drive to Austin to get there well before the registration began so that I could secure a parking place near the convention center. We were told that parking would be extremely limited on the first day of the convention because it fell on a work day. I left at 3:00 AM, took my time and arrived a little before 6:00 AM. I had breakfast at the Marriott where I talked to four delegates from a district that spans from San Antonio to El Paso. They told me that they attended the $50 reception the previous night and were extremely disappointed. There was no food other than horrible little appetizers and they offered a cash bar. Out of the each delegate's $50 the party probably pocketed $49.50.

I arrived at the convention center a little before 7:00 AM and there were extremely long lines waiting to get into the ballrooms where the credentials were distributed. Once in the ballroom things move fairly quickly. I found our senate district booth and registered. I was told that we would need photo ID but no one asked me for it. Things there seemed very disorganized with some folks not listed on their rosters. They seemed to be able to resolve this somehow, legitimately I hope, because otherwise anyone could have walked in there and become a delegate.

At that point there was nothing to do until 9:00 AM when the individual sessions began except to walk around the exhibit floor. In this area there were booths set up just like you would see at a trade show but most not more than a table with folks standing behind them. There I found a bunch of vendors selling a lot of worthless junk like pins, t-shirts, and other paraphernalia. There were also booths there from special interests. A few energy companies were there giving away those new efficient light bulbs. I picked up some of these, had my picture taken with a cardboard cutout of Obama, and received a free t-shirt with a picture of Tom Delay behind bars on the back with the caption “Put the Hammer in the Slammer”. I also purchased a deck of playing cards for $5.00 from a couple of enterprising young men who had created the deck called Gay, Really Straight, Republican Hypocrites Playing Cards. For the most part this area of the convention was a waste of time.

The Obama campaign had a presence on the exhibit floor giving away buttons and bumper stickers, only one to each person. The Clinton campaign elected to set up shop outside across the street from the convention center under a large tent. I did not wander over there but assumed that they were selling stuff there. I am not sure why they were not inside other than out of courtesy to Obama, since she had dropped out of the race a few days before. Given the personality of the candidate I do not think this is a likely explanation, but I have no other and I did not think about asking, because I really didn’t care.

After my visit to the exhibits I perused the schedule of sessions to determine which ones to attend. Wow, what a selection, and also what a mess. There were 45 sessions. Here is a partial list to give you an idea of what they offered:

· Gun Owners Caucus
· Progressive Hispanic Caucus
· Texas Military Veterans
· Black Caucus
· Pro-Choice, Pro-Prevention
· UAW caucus
· Motorcycle Caucus
· Texas Muslim Democratic Caucus

These were scheduled from 9:00 AM to 2:00 PM, with varying lengths from one hour to two and one half hours. The schedule looked like it was established by that room of 100 typing monkeys. It was impossible for a delegate to attend more than a few events because these session overlapped and where there was not overlap there was no break between sessions to permit one to get to sessions on time. This extensive lineup of sessions should have been offered over a two to three day duration with some sessions duplicated across that time to permit more delegates to attend the more popular ones.

I decided to attend the following sessions:

· Single Payer Universal Healthcare – 9:00 AM to 11:00 AM
· Challenging the Religious Right: Restoring Faith in Texas – 11:00 AM to 12:00 PM
· Democrats Against the Death Penalty – 12:00 PM to 1:30 PM

I expected to miss some of the second and third sessions due to no break between them but I expected to make it to the first one on time. My expectations were soon revised as I could not find the room for the Single Payer Universal Healthcare session. It was listed as being in a room on Level 3 of the convention center. So I took the escalator from the first to the second level, got on the next escalator that took me to the fourth level. I look around and down and verify that there is indeed a third level but cannot determine how to get there. I check the convention brochure, which lists the floor plans for the first, second, and fourth levels. There is no mention of reference to a third level except in the session schedule.

I went back down to the first level and found a convention center employee and asked for directions. He asked why I need to go to that level, I told him, and he said that the third level is normally used for storage so the general public access is very limited. The only way to get there is by going all the around the convention center to the back set of stairs, or take the elevator located near there.

Single Payer Universal Healthcare

I arrive late for this session but so did a whole lot of other delegates. I was glad that I made the effort to attend this session because I knew nothing about single-payer healthcare and what I learned opened my eyes. This appears to be the only sensible solution to our healthcare problem in America. Many other countries have employed this approach with very successful results. For example the costs to insure everyone in this country can be reduced dramatically under this system because the overhead to manage the plan drops from 27% to 3%. None of the myths about the government choosing your doctors, or not being able to receive timely care are true. The key component is the elimination of the monolithic insurance companies and centralizing all payments under a single, non-profit entity. There is a lot more to this than that and too much to recount here. The bottom line is that there are enormous out-of-pocket savings to both the employees and employers and we should be moving very quickly to adopt this system.

Challenging the Religious Right: Restoring Faith in Texas

I made it to this session late and was able to sneak in to the back row next to the wall with an empty seat beside me to stow my stuff. It was hot in this room and I immediately added my sport jacket to the pile of stuff on the seat beside me.
As good as the previous session was, this one was bad. There were two speakers, unrecognizable state or US congressmen. Both of these guys spent their time talking about themselves and telling unfunny jokes. At no time during the forty or so minutes that I suffered through did they once mention the topic, even though the moderator had assured us that they were there to provide insight on what they have been doing to stop the religious right from taking over the government.
I had had about enough when someone taps me on the shoulder and asks if anyone is sitting in the seat beside me. This seat is piled up with computer bag, a bag full of worthless stuff given to candidates, a book, and my sport jacket. I look at her like she is crazy, mentally noting the clusters of the empty seats around the room. She persists so I gather all of my stuff, step over the back of the seat while muttering profanities, loud enough for her to hear but not disruptive to the room.

Democrats Against the Death Penalty

Because I extracted myself early from the previous, worthless session I was able to make it to this one on time. Good thing too, because this was standing room only a full ten minutes before it started. I have always been anti death penalty and this session reinforced my stance.
The first speaker was a chaplain who spent a lot of years in Huntsville where all of the “legal” murders take place in Texas. His change from being a death penalty facilitator to being totally opposed to it is recounted in a book and documentary film. He shared some of this transformation with us.
The next speaker was a mother of a death penalty victim who after being killed in Huntsville was cleared of guilt. This was an extremely emotional presentation. She is now devoting her life to educating people about the horrors of this barbaric ritual of ours.


At 1:30 PM I was free until 3:00 PM when the senate district caucus convened. There was nothing provided at any time in the form of food or drink. The only thing that I purchased in the convention center was a cup of tea before the Single Payer Universal Healthcare session for $3.00. I cannot remember ever paying that much anywhere for a single cup of tea. From that I surmised that everything sold inside the convention center was overly inflated, so I looked for a place to eat outside.

One good thing about the location of the convention center is the abundance of restaurants nearby. I chose Pei Wei and as expected it was extremely crowded. As I was giving the hostess my name two people were being led to their table. The hostess was apologizing that it was a table for six to which they replied that they would be OK if they seated others there. I immediately spoke up and said that I would eat with them if they did not mind and as a result was able to jump ahead of the crowd and be seated immediately. These folks were great company. They recently retired and moved to the “hill country” to be near their grandchildren. They had some fascinating stories and I would have liked to spend more time with them

I returned to the convention center to attend my senate district caucus. When I arrived at the designated room I found the place in a state of semi-managed chaos. This was a very large ballroom that had two distinct groups huddling on opposite sides of the room. I was soon to learn that there were two different senate districts in the room and that they were trying to determine the number of delegates who had not shown up in order to promote alternates to the open positions. As usual there seemed to be no organization or process. A whole lot of people were crowded around the ones who seemed to be in charge of this. They spent a long time doing trying to sort out this mess, a task that should have been completed before anyone arrived. When they finally finished out the circus began.

Both senate district groups tried to conduct business simultaneously. The other group gained control of the single microphone so they had an easier time of getting things going. After several minutes of our guys trying to shout over the other group’s leadership they had a pow-wow and agreed that they would share the microphone and the business of the groups would be conducted alternately, i.e., the first group would elect their chairperson, then the second group would elect theirs, back and forth until all elections were completed.

The process followed Roberts Rules of Order, I think, whereby the floor was opened for nominees, delegates were nominated, each nominee was given an opportunity to introduce themselves, and nominations were closed. The delegates voted by raising their badge when each name was called. When the votes were too close to visually determine a winner the procedure was repeated only this time the badges were held up until a couple of the alternates walked around counting the raised badges. As they counted they either pointed at you or touched you which was the signal that you were to lower your badge. There were several instances on both sides of the room when this “verification” was necessary.

During this process I could not help to think that here we are, selecting leadership positions and, eventually, delegates to the national convention. These folks will make a contribution to either how the party operates or who the party formally nominates as a candidate for president. And here we are with these goofballs running around counting raised badges. There were no checks and balances to determine if anyone voted twice, or if everyone who was voting was indeed eligible to vote. It was a process that was hard to take seriously, no matter how hard that I tried.

I didn’t know any of the people who were “running” for all of these official positions. We were not given any information about them other than their 10-second introductions after they were nominated. So how was one supposed to be able to make an informed choice? After about five of these votes I just stopped raising my badge and sat back and watched this “democratic” fiasco. A few of us got a lot of laughs about how seriously some of these folks were taking such a ridiculous process. A quick aside – CSPAN recently asked callers to respond to the question, “Should the media provide more or less convention coverage?” Now they were referring to the national conventions, but I after what I went through in Austin I have no confidence that the national convention is run any differently than this one. So for all of those folks who responded that they want to see everything that goes on at a national convention, trust me, you really do not. Any confidence that you may have in the democratic process would be lost and you would be hitting the remote to look for anything except the convention coverage.

The most humorous item to note during this mess was the “election” of a position, the title of which I do not remember. It was obvious from the start that everyone who was elected to any position, committee, etc., would be Obama delegates, due to the two to one delegate advantage that they had over the Clinton delegates in our state senate district. One of the Clinton delegates was nominated and when it was her turn to address the group she made a passionate plea. She stated that all of the preceding positions were filled with Obama delegates and that we should show the world that the party is ready to come together. To demonstrate this we should elect a Clinton delegate, her, to this position. There were a lot of snickers in the crowd. She received about five votes. When she saw this she stormed off the stage like a little girl, before the vote was completed, and without congratulating the winner, an Obama delegate, of course.

It was nearing 6:00 PM and we were not even close to completing the business of our district. We were going to have to come back after the general session to finish things. After all that I had seen during that day, I decided that I really had no purpose there. I wasn’t voting for anyone and the only votes that I really wanted to cast were for two people that I wanted to see elected as delegates to the national convention. There was nothing to gain from the general session either on Friday or Saturday, so I decided that I would not be staying the night and called the hotel to cancel my reservation.

After we adjourned we all went downstairs to attend the general session. Each district was assigned a seating area and ours was decently placed, in the middle of the room and not too far back. I went to that area to sit with my fellow delegates and these folks were too goofy for me to put up with, i.e., they were whooping it up, waving signs, and doing the stuff that you would expect after seeing the same kind of thing on TV during the national convention. I just did not have the patience for this so I opted to sit way back where anyone from the general public was assigned seating. There was absolutely no one in these sections aside from a few delegates like me who did not want to put up with the nonsense in the front of the hall.

Sitting next to me was a guy reading the book “The Last Lecture”. I asked him if he was enjoying the book and he said yes. He went on to tell me that the book had added significance because he had been diagnosed that week with an untreatable form of cancer. I felt my body go limp as I searched for something to say. He noticed my discomfort and assured me that all is well. He had had a good life up to then and had no complaints. He was resigned to live out his few remaining months in a positive fashion and no one should feel sorry for him.

I was stunned and paid little attention to the goings on during the beginning of the general session. Had we not been required to stand I probably would not have noticed the ridiculous benediction that was given by some female pastor. Yes I would because of all of the noise that this generated. She was raising her voice in prayer and praise while many of those in the congregation shouted hallelujahs and amens. This was truly not the time or place for this but I guess we should expect more and more of this as we permit our leaders to tear down the church/state wall.

the brief conversation with the guy reading "The Last Lecture" was quite sobering and led me to the conclusion that I had to get away from the nonsense going on in the convention hall.

After the obligatory stuff was over it was announced that a certain committee must meet immediately to transact business. I do not remember the name of this committee, but it was one for which we had just elected a representative. The speaker asked that everyone who was a member of the committee to leave the hall immediately and proceed to a specific location. I recognized this as my chance to make a quick and graceful exit. No one would know that I was not a member of this committee and I could be on my way home to Houston before the first speaker had completed his remarks. So I was gone.

As it turns out I didn’t miss a thing, except voting for the national convention delegates. The two people that I wanted to vote for won anyway, so my vote was not missed. I missed a bunch of rah-rah Democrat stuff and an appearance by Chelsea Clinton. Really. Chelsea was there, for what purpose I do not know. I cannot believe that a person with such insignificance was given the time to talk. These guys must have been desperate for a name because Hillary and Barack, though invited, did not attend either day of the convention.

So what looked like a 3-4 day affair turned into one very long day.

I Want a Voice Part 5 – Preparing for the Texas State Democratic Convention

A few weeks after the state senatorial district convention I attended a general meeting for the delegates from our district. This was to be an organizational meeting to familiarize us with what to expect at the state convention and make the necessary logistical preparations to attend. At this meeting we were told that most of the hotel rooms were already booked and that they would be working to secure alternate lodging. This did not affect me because the day after agreeing to go to the state convention I booked a room for four days, June 5-8. I was all set.

The process for applying to be a delegate for the national convention was presented. Anyone wishing to be considered must complete a form, have it notarized, and mail it to the state committee by May 21. I was considering doing this because I figured I had come this far in the process so why not. And, to be perfectly honest, I did not mind doing any of this, aside from being extremely annoyed at the total disorganization throughout, because I wanted to see how all of this worked and possibly be a part of a fairly historic event.

We were told that our district would receive a total of four delegates, two for each candidate, and a single alternate for the national convention. The delegates would be split evenly, two for each candidate. This didn’t seem correct because coming out of our district convention Obama had roughly twice as many delegates than Clinton. When questioned about this we were told that this factored in the primary votes, that two-thirds thing that I mentioned earlier. So what this really meant was that it did not matter how many delegates showed up at the district convention, the number that was going to be sent to the national convention was already set. It makes sense that the split would come out that way if there were a lot of other precincts that encountered the same Clinton no-showitis as ours. As it turned out the only impact any of this had was on the voting for district party positions, which, I think, went all to Obama supporters, but I am getting ahead of myself.

We were still confused about where the other delegates that were going to the state convention were. You know, the ones represented by the primary vote. We were told that there were no other delegates. All of the delegates that go to the state convention are chosen by the delegates that attend the district conventions. Because they factor their votes into the national convention delegate split it all comes out in the wash, so to speak. I am still a bit confused by all of this, but the system seems to be designed to give a small group of party members all of the power while giving the entire party the illusion that they have some input in the process. The bottom line is that if you do not attend a precinct caucus and get involved in the process as a delegate you never see any of this and have no idea how all of this works. Heck, I did get involved and it is still murky.

So I am sitting there considering my chances of landing one of spots that would permit me to attend the national convention in Denver. My chances are dwindling because two of the five must go to a Clinton supporter. Then they tell us that the delegates must have equal gender distribution and that a coin flip determined that the alternate spot must be female. There is a single position available to all of the male Obama delegates. I determine that I have about as much chance of being elected to that spot as being struck by lightening. All of the Obama delegates want to go to the national convention, I am sure. I opt not to file any paperwork for a national convention delegate candidacy.

The other information that we received was about the convention schedule. The event was to kick off at a reception on the evening of Thursday, June 6. This event limited the number of who could attend and would cost $50.00. This seemed strange. Here are people spending their own time and money to attend this convention and not only do they charge for the welcoming reception, they limit the number of attendees that can participate. I crossed this off this list, thereby saving me an unnecessary night in the hotel on Wednesday. Because they said at the district convention that the state convention would be held June 6-8, I assumed that it would start the morning of June 6 and it would be necessary to be there the night before, but it turns out that it was not.

The first mandatory activity that we had to attend was the sign-in to pick up our credentials. This was to begin at 7:00 or 7:30 AM, this was never really clear. We were all very hopeful that it was not managed the same way as at the district convention.

The next thing discussed was the Blue-Star Breakfast, another limited seating event that cost $35.00 to attend. I considered this for awhile until they told us it was sold out. They wasted our time telling us all about this because these are political wonks who eat this stuff up and believe that we all want to be sniffing around at these events like they do. This appeared to be a waste so I mentally opted out of this.

A list of special interest caucuses, meetings, and presentations was discussed. These were to begin at 9:00 AM and run until 1:30 PM. You could pick any or none of these sessions to attend. But it was essential that we attend the 3:00 PM district caucus. That is where all of the elections would take place for committees, officers, and national convention delegates.

So, looking at all of this I really did not have to be there until sometime before 3:00 PM on Friday to register and get to the district caucus. I could get there earlier to do some stuff but had nothing requiring me to do so.

A general session is to follow the district caucus and again on Saturday morning.

After a bunch of rah-rah-let’s-put-Democrats-in-power antics they opened it up for questions. I asked if any of the expenses that we incur to attend the state convention are tax deductible. No they are not. Hmmm. All of these people from all walks of life spend their time and resources to move candidates through the process and do it all on their own dime. Yet huge companies through their PACs and executive donors can contribute large sums of money that is tax deductible. What’s wrong with this picture?

So I analyzed the situation and determined that I could really get away with only spending one night in Austin if I drive back after the convention ends on Saturday. When I got home I changed my reservation to a one-night stay on Friday night.

After that, two meetings were scheduled for the Obama delegates from my state senate district. The first one I was unable to attend, but I was able to make it to the second one. This was another waste of time, at least for me it was. The meeting started 30 minutes late and was marred with unnecessary minutia like what color the dots would be on the credential badges that would distinguish a Clinton delegate from an Obama delegate. There may have been meaningful business transacted or valuable information shared after I left at the scheduled end time. They did not appear even close to finishing anytime soon so I decided to make better use of my time.

During the time leading up to the state convention I received numerous emails and phone calls asking me if I would be attending the convention. Each time I answered in the affirmative and expected that after the second or third one these calls and messages would stop. But they just kept coming. I wrote this off as yet another example of the party’s total disorganization.

At some point during this period I was asked to be the Democratic chairman for my precinct. I explained that I was not currently a Democrat and would not be the best person for this job. I left the door open by telling them that I would consider it if they could not find anyone else to do the job. I was nearly ready to “drink their Kool-aid”.